patching...
Update: Get Medford's latest headlines in your inbox each morning—sign up for our free newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Markey or Lynch: Who Would You Vote for Today?

Democratic congressmen Ed Markey and Stephen Lynch will face off in a primary on April 30 in the race to fill the Massachusetts Senate seat vacated by new Secretary of State John Kerry.

 

Editor's note: This article was updated on Friday at 1:20 p.m. after Scott Brown announced he would not run for the Senate seat.

We have a race.

On Thursday, U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch became the second candidate to officially enter the race to fill the Senate seat vacated by new Secretary of State John Kerry, following his fellow Democratic Congressman Ed Markey.

Lynch and Markey will now face off in a primary set for April 30 for the right to represent the Democratic Party in the special election on June 25 against a still unknown Republican opponent, as no GOP candidate has officially entered the race yet. Former U.S. Senator Scott Brown fired an early salvo against Markey, but told the Boston Herald on Friday that he would not run for Senate.

There are differences between Lynch and Markey, despite being members of the same party. Lynch voted against Obamacare, officially called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, while Markey voted for the bill.

Lynch also has an anti-abortion stance, although it's not absolute—Planned Parenthood currently gives him a score of 83 percent to Markey's 100 percent. The National Right to Life Committee, meanwhile, gave Lynch a score of 10 percent during the last Congressional session, while Markey received a zero.

The most recent National Journal rankings from 2011 give Markey a liberal score of 89.2, making him the 41st most liberal member of the House, while Lynch received a liberal score of 72.8, ranking him the 123rd most liberal member of the House.

Lynch also touts his union support as a former ironworker who then graduated from law school and later won his current congressional seat in 2001, while Markey, also a lawyer by trade, was first elected to Congress in 1976.

Another potential factor is the state's unenrolled voters, who can choose to cast a ballot in one party's primary. Over half of Bay State voters are registered as unenrolled, which would allow unenrolled voters who lean right to vote in the Democratic primary for Lynch—or against Markey—if they decide to show up at the polls. During the special Senate election in 2010 between Brown and state Attorney General Martha Coakley, during the height of the Obamacare debate, 54 percent of registered Massachusetts voters turned out.

Who would you vote for if the primary were held today: Lynch or Markey? Are you an unenrolled voter and, if so, do you plan to vote in the Democratic primary on April 30? Tell us your plans to vote in the comments below.

Related Topics: Ed Markey, Election 2013, Massachusetts Special Senate Election, Scott Brown, Stephen Lynch, and john kerry

Cathie Earle

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

As an Independent, I will vote for Scott Brown if he decides to run. I would not vote for Markey under any circumstance as he is part of the problem in Washington. He has taken a paycheck from taxpayers since he was in his early twenties, never worked a "real job" in his life. Time for all of the career politicians to go home.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kay Sarah

9:40 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Cathy, don't be fooled, Scott Brown is also a career politician ie; local office - town of Wrentham, State Representative, State Legislator and U.S. Senator. In fact this is the first time in twenty years that he is not holding public office. I have a hunch that he is taking time off to plan and strategize for his next run for public office; the 2014 Gubernatorial race.

Comment_arrow

Who Me?

11:45 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Kay Sarah....so...is a "career politician" a good or bad thing?

Just curious

Comment_arrow

Diana

12:15 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

In real life, it's a neutral thing, like any career. In the Special Olympics of Political Commentary that one generally finds here, it's "experience" when it's your guy, and "hackery" when it's theirs.

Comment_arrow

Kay Sarah

12:01 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I don't think that a career politician is a bad thing. It depends on the candidate. Most candidates work their way up to certain offices and as they work their way up they become more seasoned. Politics is all about compromise and that takes practice.

Rob

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

This is like voting for Stalin over Hitler. I'd take Stalin (Lynch).

Reply
Comment_arrow

Daniel DeMaina

1:24 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Didn't take long for Godwin's Law to take effect.

Comment_arrow

Mark

10:18 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Markey is a member of the Congressional Progressive aka Communist Caucus. He/They want your employer to send your paycheck to Beacon Hill and they'll return to you an allowance.
Don't know much about Lynch other than a lot of corruption and incompetence went down under his watch along with the rest of the Corruptocrats on Beacon Hill.
NECC scandal (resulted in multiple deaths), Drug Lab Scandal (Nobody released has killed anyone... yet), Parole Board Scandal (resulted in Cinelli murdering Maguire), Sex Offender Registry Scandal, (hundreds of children molested) Housing Authority Scandal, EBT - Welfare Scandal, Turner, Wilkerson, DiMassi, Finneran, Murray, McLaughlin, Covelle (all indicted and most convicted), $93 Million stolen from legal American taxpayers in 2011 alone and given to Illegal Aliens for healthcare, Everygreen Solar Scam................
Deval and the rest of the Dems are not quite Hitler or Stalin yet, but its not from lack of trying. Its only because they are inept!

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

7:48 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Rob: your Stalin or Hitler so called analogy has absolutely no relevance. Is Brown, Bozo the Clown; is Romney, Elmer Fud; is Christine O'Donald , the wicked witch of the East?

THEBIGBT

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I have seen younger faces on cash! This is a race for the US Senate not a Bruce Hornsby tribute band!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

9:50 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Love it! You're so right, we need young bloods, not old fogies. And, old fogie free loaders at that. What's that saying? "The older I grow, the less I know."

John Skerry

12:43 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I would vote for Ed Markey, he has a proven record and I feel he is more expierenced

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ron

3:27 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Just curious, what is his record? What has he done, and when was the last time he was in MA, let alone Malden?

JIM

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Lynch. Does Markey even still live in Massachusetts ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

7:50 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Jim: yes he does. he works in Washington DC; that is where the job is; that is where I want him to be- where the job is. Unusual? or are you just making a disparaging comment, Jim. Some point in saying that . tell us.

marianne

1:29 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

A few years ago, a candidate opposing Markey went out with a video camera to Markey's 'home'. The people in the neighborhood couldn't even recognize his picture, and had no clue that a congressman 'lived' in the house. The house, by the way, with mail piling up at the door waiting for someone to come to collect it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

2:48 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Sort of like Mitt Romney living in Belmont when running for Governor and Pres. No one saw Anne at the grocery store in 2 years, she use to come in all the time. after selling his Belmont house, Romney claimed he lived in the basement of his son's house. In MA , your residency is where you intend to live. But why is this an issue? Another Republican ruse , like Obama's birth certificate, Eliz Warren's heritage on a form some 30 years ago. Crazy sideshow stuff, for people that don't have issues and a record to discuss.

Comment_arrow

Patricia

3:47 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Tyler J. Warren listed herself as a Native American clearly during the election. She used a fake heritage to further herself. That is one reason why I will never support her or have any respect for her. She will always be a fraud in my book.

Barry

1:31 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Centerfold Scottie announced today that he isn't running. Thank goodness for small favors.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sam

3:02 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Ya I feel soooo much better now that the fake Indian is leading us. Since elected I have noticed the middle class getting some relief. I have noticed Wall Street coming back to earth. I have noticed the big banks suffering.

Comment_arrow

Mike

4:04 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Sam, Elizabeth Warren has been in office less than a month, and was part of the backlash against AIG that likely got the company to drop its participation in a suit against the Feds, and announced a joint investigation of the Federal Reserve's policy of settling claims against big mortgage lenders, the "To Big to Fail" banks.

What did you do in January?

Comment_arrow

Sam

4:30 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I can guarantee it was a whole lot more than her! She based her entire campaign of how we were getting hammered. How about a simple statement from her new penthouse about she was against the tax hike. Perhaps a statement about how she opposes mini me's tax hikes. Bring on the crickets.... You know it and I know it. She was nothing more than a Dem front they pushed through to vote their way.

Comment_arrow

Mike

10:21 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Sam, I know it's probably been a long time since the 8th grade for you, but I think you need a refresher in basic civics. As US senator, she has little to no say in the fiscal operations of state government.

So, in the little time she's been in office, she has already started working on the major issues that she campaigned on and is starting the push to make big banks accountable for their actions during the fiscal crisis.

Again, what did you do in January?

Comment_arrow

Ron

3:49 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Mike, Ok, so she sitting in DC working on the major issues that she campaigned on and is starting the push to make big banks accountable for their actions during the fiscal crisis.

But what did she have to say after she sat and watched her campaign sugar daddy suggest the increase in payroll tax (working class). Something that those who are abusing his EBT system and the illegals will not have to pay.

Here answer to his proposed payroll tax increase? .........crickets........ Because no one thought anyone would ask her what her opinion was. "No tough questions please, she can't explain any answers to anything, She'll have a press conference to tell you her thoughts and opinions once they are given to her".

Comment_arrow

Mike

11:35 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Sam, if, at this stage, you still don't understand how our system of government works, then I'm really at a loss to explain it to you. Patrick's proposed budget is just that -- a proposal -- and will need to be approved by the state legislature before passage. As a US senator, Elizabeth Warren has no input into state budget creation and is not responsible for auditing or analyzing the various state functions that the budget pays for.

Seriously, this really is grade-school civics...

Comment_arrow

Ron

8:10 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Mike, the reason she didn't stand up and say that Mini Me's proposal is a bad idea is because he endorsed her, she wouldn't dare go against his wishes, even if it was against her campaign.

Could you imagine if Scott Brown came up with the proposal the Governor presented? Good lord Senator Warren would f;y down from the ivory tower and go on the war path with such a proposal. But......it wasn't Scott Brown it was her sugar daddy. She will give her opinion on the proposal once it is given to her.........Wait a minute, no she won't. She's just get disgusted and walk away from the question. That is so beneath her. Like 99% of the working class.

Comment_arrow

Mike

9:20 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Ron, or...maybe she didn't "stand up" to Patrick's proposal because she knew that, a) it's a proposal and will likely be changed significantly as it winds through the Legislature, and/or b) nothing contained within his proposal involves her work as a US senator.

She's not involved in the state-level sausage factory of lawmaking; again, as I tried to explain to Sam, her job as a US senator is to represent Massachusetts on the national level. If you're upset about Patrick's proposal, complain to your STATE senator and representative.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

8:06 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Sam : the election is over. Elizabeth Warren is the MA US Senator and Barack Obama won by 5 million votes and has been re-elected President of the United States for the second time, in a democratically held election, where all those that were registered were allowed to vote and express their preference.
Some like to carry on just as if that never happened.

Sam

2:01 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Bring on Ed Markey! Boy are we lucky

Reply

CallMeFrustrated

2:11 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Hey - it's MA! Never a good candidate to vote for... but I'll vote for whomever is running against these losers.

Reply

Charles Dell

2:35 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Lynch is not a "Party" voter, he is different than Markey who is a voter for the party as opposed to the constituancy!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tad Pohl

4:09 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Lynch's party voting record is 90%, Markey's party voting record is 91%. Where did you get your information.

Who Me?

2:56 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Lynch voted with the D 85% of the time
Markey voted with the D 90% of the time

Reply

Who Me?

2:59 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Brown will run for Governor

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

10:35 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Brown has ZERO fiscal experience for the governorship. Helps his wife with the laundry every campaign season. Brown's experience is doing residential real estate closings for the last 20 years, something recent law school graduates do before moving on. This is like , "let's find a government elected office , and try to fit him in because we have nobody else to run.
Markey makes sense . I'll vote US Senator Markey (D), a Democrat with experience and intelligence, progressive ideas, good for massachusetts, live here all his life, knows the state and the people, middle class values, will perpetuate the Kennedy tradition..

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

2:48 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Tyler, I cannot think of better executive experience for preparing and passing budgets than being a Selectman. Really.

Comment_arrow

Me

1:32 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Ron, Just curious - where is it you live that the Selectmen prepare the budgets? Because in Tewksbury, the Town Manager and Finance Director Prepare the budgets - just saying

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

7:50 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

What you write is true, Me; however, the Town Manager acts as a proxy for the Board of Selectmen. Indeed, every town budget is prepared by the Town Manager (for towns that have them -- about 100 do not) with the help of the Finance Director. And in every town, that budget is then reviewed line by line by the Board of the Selectmen. The Selectmen then vote to recommend the budget to Town Meeting. The Selectmen are the executors, not the Town Manager. The Selectmen are elected to office, not the Town Manager.

This is not unlike a Governor directing his budget director to prepare a budget, reviewing it, and approving it before sending it to the Legislature. In fact, it is a very, very similar responsibility for the Selectman and the Governor in the budget process.

I cannot think of better preparation for the Corner Office than being a Selectman.

Dan D.

3:04 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I love this. Hardly anybody thinks Congress is doing a good job, but many of those same folks will vote for a hack who's been on the public dole for his entire life, and been in Congress for decades! Markey is indeed part of the establishment, and hence part of the problem. Even if he has done some good, enough is enough, don't promote him to Senator! Vote for his retirement next time around, not a promotion!

Reply

Judy O'Brien

3:08 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I'll have to write me in since Scott Brown isn't going to run...wish he would.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyrone

8:04 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Start a write in campain for Scott Brown. To vote for another "D" will be another loss for 5tthe working people.

Comment_arrow

JT

8:13 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Seriously? Doesn't stand a chance. A no-name, do nothing mayor from one of the worst cities in the state.

Rob C.

3:29 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I'll vote for the non Socialist on the ticket if that is the only choice I have. Hopefully an independent will come along that everyone can get behind and win. Unfortunately in this state the sheep will just look for the D and vote for that instead of the person who is on the ballot.

Reply

To tole

3:40 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

David Keele as a write in! He knows how to break the union strangleholds

Reply

Mike

4:06 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Maybe some of the Scotty Brown swooners need to take a look at the background of the person who might have challenged him: look up Gabriel Gomez of Cohasset.

If not this year, Gomez might make a great candidate

Reply

Dick

4:25 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Neither is worth the effort to get out and vote. God help us!

Reply

BD

6:14 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Neither. There must be a better choice out there - someone who will take the country's financial woes, unemployment, deficit, etc. serious and not just vote for more taxes.

Reply

Jim Stratton

6:19 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Which one resigned from his current job to look for this new position? Or are we going to pay for them to "campaign" instead of "represent us"?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

11:20 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Great question ... we support free loaders and nobody seems to object.

Patch_comments_icon

Andrew Sylvia

9:11 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I covered New Hampshire for awhile, so I want to apologize in advance to everyone, I know at some point I am going to subconsciously refer to Stephen Lynch as John Lynch.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Stratton

9:28 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

LOL...say, isn't John Lynch available now? :-)

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Andrew Sylvia

9:47 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

He is! But I think New Hampshire would have to annex Massachusetts for that to work, I don't think he's moving....

linda

6:48 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Warren, Senior Senator! What a joke. She wasn't even qualified to be Junior Senator and now we have Markey and Lynch and Scott isn't running. OMG! What the heck has Markey done in the last twenty years! This state is so stupid. We had the chance to vote Scott in and look what we did. I actually heard people say during the last election "I know Scott is good for this State and the better choice but Massachusetts is a democratic state, so we have to go for her". Time to vote the person and not the party!! I hope that Scott will run for governor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike

10:26 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Linda, as an independent,m unenrolled voter, I voted the person and not the party...and didn't choose a guy with limited skills and a nice smile.

Again, if you're looking for a potentially strong Republican candidate, consider Gabriel Gomez: principal in a financial equity firm (although slightly allied with Bain), Harvard MBA, former Navy SEAL.

Comment_arrow

linda

5:21 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Mike, as an independent, "unenrolled" voter, I didn't vote for the guy with the limited skills and nice smile! I voted for the guy who was willing to cross party lines when it was needed! I chose not to vote for the woman who had her head so far up Obama's behind that it would be just like we had Obama for Senator! As for Gabriel Gomez, I have to say I know nothing about him but would certainly be willing to learn about him.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

4:32 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Linda: what did Brown do in the last 2 years? Nothing. Copied a few of Obama's jobs bill proposals , watered down the finance reform bill, voted against equal pay for women, voted not to repeal oil subsidies for his buddies the Koch brothers that funded his campaign, bragged about voting against healthcare for 32 million uninsured, working poor, Americans, thought getting out of Iraq was a mistake.
The phony is gone; we now have US Senator Warren, for 6 years, who stands for something, no double talk like Scotty. There is a reason Brown lost by 7 points. The barn coat and truck can only take you so far , when you are sneaking into the country club to see your corporate buddies.
So give it up; pretty boy is gone, will have plenty of time to fold the laundry now.

Comment_arrow

Ron

4:51 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

TJ, Warren is a FRAUD. She will do nothing except what is told to do by her handlers and what's in her best interest.

broadway Jay

7:17 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Markey is a consummate D.C. Beltway Barnicle.

Reply

Karen Santella

8:55 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Definitely Markey. He has the skills and the experience to represent us, and I will campaign for him, too.

Reply

Frank Ryan

9:31 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Markey will win and the whiners who back losing candidates wil continue with negative postings and what sometimes are outright lies. It makes the election season fun.

Reply

Susan

10:02 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Voting for Markey. He is a great environomentalist and will support meaningful legislation to deal with climate change, which is the most important issue for the U.S. and the planet at this moment in history.

Reply
Comment_arrow

linda

5:42 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Susan, was this sarcasm? You didn't actually mean that climate change is the most important issue for the U.S. did you?

Comment_arrow

Myron Dittmer

6:41 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Linda......I think Susan is one of those far, far, far, left liberals.......who believes that the environment trumps everything...even though their hero, Al Gore is a fraud, as well as their theory! She would vote for Markey if he were a stuffed doll and.... manipulated by strings from above...actually......he is...and controlled by Obama.

Comment_arrow

linda

8:06 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

MFD, I would hate to think anyone can look at the mess this Country is in and think that the environment is the MOST important issue. As far as stuffed doll, I was just looking at the pictures of Markey and Lynch above -- they do sort of look like Marionettes along with bobble heads Elizabeth Warren and Nancy Pelosi, all being controlled by Obama, which wouldn't be a bad thing I guess if Obama was qualified to any of their jobs!

Comment_arrow

JT

8:16 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

I just got done shoveling 24 inches of climate change.

J.R.

10:05 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

I'll be voting for Markey for the same reasons Susan will.

Reply

Wind Dummy 25

12:21 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Keary Healey...She's been busy actually doing relevant stuff. She knows the state as well as foreign issues. I'd love to see her as a Senator. Why not two female senators from Mass? Especially now...Great balance and it would be amazing to see this scenario play out. Markeys mostly faceless and useless. lynch is better, but underwhelming. He is marginal as a Rep and that's about it.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reappointed Healey in 2009. Healey chaired the PPP's Afghan Women Lawyers' Training Conference held in California and Washington, DC, and in 2010, she led the Afghan Defense Lawyer Training Program in Boston and Washington, DC. Healey currently serves as president of the Board of the Friends of the PPP, a 501 non-profit that assists the PPP in achieving its goals in carrying out its work with Afghan judges and lawyers, as well as fundraising.

Reply

Ron Powell

1:06 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

I would like to see Kerry Healey or Karyn Polito run from the GOP side. It would be an uphill battle (although not impossible) for either to win; however, either would position herself for a prominent position in a Brown administration (assuming he runs and wins), or a national office should the GOP retake the Presidency in 2016.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Raj

1:23 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

The problem is the GOP in MA is a joke. Without Scott Brown they are scrambling to come up with a candidate that they can toss in the race and hope for the best. I really think the only up and coming Republican in Massachusetts with even the slightest chance would be Richard Tisei. Granted, he's got some baggage and ran a pretty terrible campaign against John Tierney---but it would be good to get some younger blood in the US Senate, and face it, if Elizabeth Warren can be the Senior Senator from Massachusetts, just about anyone could do better!

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

1:42 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

The GOP in Massachusetts is a knee-jerk reaction to the excesses of one-party rule. The fact that it is so weak is, paradoxically, one of its strongest attributes. In fact, I think that Brown's biggest mistake in the Senate race was his failure to turn his opponent's GOP-dusting to his advantage. The Democratic Party controls everything in Massachusetts; it is the party that is bought by both unions AND Wall Street. And you really believe that any candidate that this machine produces is going to change any of this? The other missed message was that, if you do not like the national GOP brand (and a majority of Massachusetts voters do not), the way to change it is to elect moderates like me. Instead, the message strangely focused on attacking Elizabeth Warren's character. I personally would have embraced the deranged Brown syndrome detractors (cf. Barry) as an example of just how irrational and out of touch progressives are with independent voters. Ah well, opportunities missed.

Comment_arrow

George

1:58 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Ron, The gop(lower case intentional) is the party of angry white men and haters. If the independents didn't like Warren how did she get elected? Time to open your eyes and ears and stop painting all progressives with the same brush. The State Congressional Delegation are all doing a good job of representing Massachusetts values in Washington. Any scent of scandal among them is manufactured by gop haters. It is hard to understand why the people who are so disgusted with Mass. stay around. There are plenty of backward states where they could go and live among likeminded regressives.

Comment_arrow

Ron

5:08 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

George, I'm interested in examples of how you feel the State Congressional Delegation are all doing a good job of representing Massachusetts values in Washington and further more what Massachusetts values are. Are all of our values the same?

It sounds to me that because Warren won the seat you're painting all citizens with the same brush as if every Independant voter supporter her. If I'm an Independant voter and if don't believe her "resume story" am I a hater? Are you ok with the many examples of fiscal irresponsibility and waste in the state and if you are is that being a hater as well?

Do you have your own opinion or does someone tell you what your opinion is? By the way, would commenting and describing someone by the colar of their skin be considered a racist remark?

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

8:56 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

That was another Ron, by the way -- but fair questions nonetheless.

Elizabeth Warren won because a disproportionate number of Democrats voted. In a state in which 32 percent of voters are Democrats, 39 percent of voters in November were Democrats. Brown won handily among Independents/Unenrolled, 59-41. The question is why so many Democrats turned out. The answer is that women who describe themselves as Democrats were enthusiastic to vote for Elizabeth Warren, and four cities -- Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Springfield -- saw a record number of women Democratic voters vote for Elizabeth Warren. Were it not for the bump in voters in those four cities, Scott Brown would have been re-elected U.S. Senator. It's a simple and as complicated as that.

I don't think that it is fair to frame the Republican Party as a party of angry white men and "haters." There are angry white men and "haters" in the GOP, no doubt, but here is who else voted for Romney:

1) about a million African-Americans
2) about three and a half million Latinos
3) about a million Asian-Americans

I would argue that these voters are neither white nor haters, but voters who believe that they can make wiser spending decisions with the money they earn than can a federal bureaucracy that has demonstrated it has trouble balancing its budget to the nearest trillion dollars. Indeed, wealth preservation and generational wealth transference are relevant to all Americans.

Tyler Jozefowicz

4:20 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Ed Markey (D) is our next US Senator. I want someone that has government experience for a government position. A Progressive Democrat is an extra bonus. The Republican Party is dead , anyway. Ever hear of a CEO with no business experience? The Republicans have got nobody. Bring back Jane Swift? The one Romney stepped over. maybe Tesei ( spell it right?)? he is a Liberal , gay , pro-choice Republican. Notice all the regular trash talk here about , hacks, Stalin, Progressive caucus. The typical negative stuff from. even bring in Senator warren , and claim she hasn't done much in a month. Hillarious! But what can you do when you got nothing.
Like I say, i'll be voting for Ed Markey. Ed will have the same coalition that brought Liz a 10 point victory.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

7:35 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Under Markey's watch hundreds of innocent children were molested by Level 1 Sex Offenders and at no time did he introduce legislation to protect the children of the Commonwealth. His silence speaks volumes for who's side he comes down on. The Pedophile or innocent children.

Under Markey's, Dominic Cinelli, who had shot a security guard had lengthy rap sheet filled with armed robberies, assaults and other offenses, had been serving three life sentences since 1976, and had chronic disciplinary problems while in prison including two escapes during which he committed crimes was allowed to walk free by a corrupt Parole Board. Where Cinelli robbed a Kohls and killed a Police Officer Jack Maguire. At no time did Markey speak out or introduce tough on crime legislation.

Anyone who votes for Markey is voting for sex offenders, cop killers, soft on crime policies and taxpayers dollars going to corrupt state agencies and Illegal Aliens.

Comment_arrow

Dan D.

9:43 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

So, you must be one of the few who think Congress is doing a real swell job? Otherwise, you wouldn't be backing a Congressional "lifer", would you?

Comment_arrow

ron johnson

11:28 am on Monday, February 4, 2013

Tyler,
I just have a couple of simple questions:
Has there ever been a Dem you have not supported, Tierney, Finneran, Dimasi, Frank, Studds.
Is there a Rep you could ever support?
Finally, if experience is the crtieria, how could you support EW?
No trash talk, here, just questions.

Wind Dummy 25

5:45 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

The party of patronage is on view for all to see for sure in Mass. I think we all see where it's been and rapidly going. They all seem to end up the super money club. Say what you will about Scott Brown, at least Brown called that corruption BS out that's been going on since the invention of the envelope.
He introduced refined and pushed the most significant bill in years on that hill. "The stock act". If that didn't appeal to everyone I don't know what would.
Neither one of these uninspiring guys, past and probably future have or will bring anything of significance to the table. They lack the "err" talent. I don't Include Warren only because she hasn't a clue at this point. She does know how to make money though. We'll see if she has the talents.
Just check out these glorious Senators. Tell me of the great inspiring deeds they presented or pushed lately. Which Senators left 100x's wealthier than when they went in. Kerry? Disgusting...
Hold on to your EBT candidates...Brown & Rubio will run for president against a withered Hillary and a tax & spent Patrick. They are darlings outside of 495. Young and tested.
By then, and as it looks now, this country should be completely shackled and barley treading water.
I still like Healey as a Senator. She's all about business. And she made money the old way, talent.

Reply

Ron Powell

2:03 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

One of Diane's comments directed at me has been deleted -- either by the Patch or Diane herself. I just wanted to make it clear to everyone that I did not report her comment nor ask that it be deleted.

Reply

Gus

8:09 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

It's definitely Markey for me. Those of you who are commenting that he doesn't come around enough are ignorant. Falling in to line, repeating GOP smear tactics. It's a funny critique for me, because except for Jim Miceli and Tom Menino - Ed Markey has been the politician I've seen the most at events, etc. He he has been a strong proponent of environmental protection for years. Most recently, he is leading the charge on creating stricter regulation of compounding pharmacies - like the one in Framingham with tainted steroids.

Reply

Dick

10:51 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

You have to ask if these two bozo's are the best that this state can come up with.
No wonder so many are disgusted enough to not vote at all

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jason

9:09 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Dick, nope. But the dependocrat machine will only allow these types of lemmings.

Steven Sadowski

1:21 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

People get the government they deserve. You would think that when a particular party has demonstrated so much outright corruption and ineptitude, people would get fed up and vote the bums out, and when those they elected to throw the bums out would eventually become corrupted themselves they would get thrown out and around we go, but at least there would be turnover! But, "no," not here in MA, or CA, or IL, or DC or a half a dozen places where one party continues to dominate despite bankrupted municipalities and programs, multiple felonious Speaker's of the House, EBT scandals, various officials on the take on every level, and rising taxes/fees as the only solution to solve a fiscal imbalance. Good luck with Warrkylynch-a-Frankentigua. Change the nomination rules so that Libertarian candidates can get on the ballot fairly and maybe you'll see real change.

Reply

Aron Levy

2:56 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Stevie Sads, please don't start in on that 'Democrats and Republicans are the same!!!!11!1' malarkey. Just because you're foolish enough to vote third party doesn't mean we're all quite that stupid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

4:26 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Given your other posts I can say: Dhere Ds Dnly Dne Darty Dou Dote Dor ;)

Comment_arrow

Steven Sadowski

12:12 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Aron:
Republicans are dead party walking. They just don't know it. From Boener to McCain to Graham to Brown it is so blatantly obvious republicans cannot match the Santa Claus party, because just when you start making sense about the deficit, and people start to listen, a Todd Akin here and a Donald Trump there comes along, and you're picking up the pieces of another election loss. How sad, you are the Cubs of politics in MA. What's worse is that you espouse freedom, the Constitution, "Don't Tread on Me" and all that red white and blue jingoistic bumper sticker jargon, but your platform is DOMA, anti-abortion, and bomb the Middle East, and don't take away my manger on the public common, and hundreds of counter-constitutional platforms that drive voters away and elect radical democrats. I mean you lost to Liz Warren. Liz freaking Warren! Pathetic. Each republican party conference accepts more and more of the Libertarian platform. You are becoming Libertarian or you're switching Democrat. It's all over but the cryin'. You heard it here 1st. Rand Paul 2106.

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

7:44 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

hey SS, I recall the 3rd party candidate got 85 votes in the last go round (?) that is dead pushing up daisies not a plausible solution, just saying. I do admire Rand Paul's common sense and will be listening closely.

Comment_arrow

Steven Sadowski

8:13 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Vinny:
When i stared talking to voters last month, I was struck by how many "republicans" I met who were socially liberal, but they voted/registered republican for one reason only, it is the only party of opposition in a blue state. And if republicans were maintaining a quorum of opposition each election, I would accept your "pushing up daisies" meme, but in CA the republicans party for the 1st time lost so many seats it is officially irrelevant. It is a matter of time before that happens here in MA. And it isn't because liberals love deficits and corruption it's because the republican social agenda gives the democrats all the fodder they need to pound you over the head with. Each election will do one of two things: slowly eliminate the republican party, or force the republican party to adopt Libertarian principles. Either way, I don't care, but I won't forget who was right/here first.

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

8:42 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

If I recall (and I don't keep a close tab on it) Rs in MA have very few seats to lose, I could be wrong but I think MA is already a lost cause. Ron Paul had his share of gem quotes. If you look up my voter registration you will find a U next to my name. Your desire to declare the R party dead and Rs having only one place to migrate is a fantasy.

Comment_arrow

Steven Sadowski

8:49 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Vinny:
They will either migrate or modify their platform. I don't see how this is even in doubt. In order for these not to be true the country will have to undergo some sort of religious Renaissance that will put abortion, DOMA, DADT, prayer in schools, and a whole host of social issues back in vogue when in fact, every poll conducted shows that these issues are headed for secularism. So, like I said, there are two things that can happen: either a.) republicans ditch the party all together, or b.) they remodel the platform to resemble that of the Liberation party. Either way is fine with me because the implementation of the ideology is more important than the party.

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

12:40 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

So you agree: "Your desire to declare the R party dead and Rs having only one place to migrate is a fantasy."

Comment_arrow

Steven Sadowski

1:26 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Vinny:
Judging by your reiteration, I can only deduce two things: either a.) you feel a religious Renaissance is in the works, or b.) you feel the GOP rank and file will stay in the party regardless of the success ratio and whether or not it is aligned with their own morals. Now that my friend is truly "fantastic."
Furthermore, I never said the republicans would cease to exist. Instead I've said they will cease to be the sole opposition party to progressives. Now it is possible, that all of these future GOP cast offs could find a new home in one party, like the Libertarians party, or they could disperse into smaller groups creating a coalition style government like they have in the UK. I could foresee an official Tea Party, a Libertarian Party, a much smaller GOP (moderate conservatives), maybe a Christian Party, being part of a larger coalition. But the days of a two party system where the GOP is the other party are slowly going away.

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

3:23 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

You did try to come down hard on the R party, it is my opinion if you did not vote R this last time then you helped the dear leader get 4 more. We agree on a lot of issues, I'm just not confident/bold enough to try to predict the future. The same was thought about the Tea Party after 2010 and we got Mr-0 again, 2014 will help to tell what to expect from them in the future.

Comment_arrow

Steven Sadowski

3:45 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Vinny:
I voted for Ron Paul up until Romney got the nomination and then voted Romney, and I was one of the few telling the republicans NOT to nominate Romney but no one listened. They wanted an "electable" candidate and look what they (Dems) did, "War on women, 47%, Swiss bank accounts, anti-gays, anti-abortion" it was like shooting fish in a barrel. I hope Axelrod gave some of his fee back. That was too easy. Warren did it here in MA, and they will keep doing it ad infinitum. For the record, the one candidate Axelrod feared the most was Huntsman because he was socially liberal and had a Libertarian foreign policy stance and exit polling showed that college aged students affiliate themselves as Libertarian (aka the future).
As for the Tea Party they are still there and still a force, they just aren't an official party where candidates run /caucus as a Tea Party candidate yet, but they could especially if Christie is nominated and if the GOP fractures.

Wind Dummy 25

11:46 am on Monday, February 4, 2013

I could get behind Gabriel Gomez or Kerry Healey. Why not..?
Their resumes speak uncorrectable. What's better than balance and trust in a U>S> Senator?
Undeniably a better choice than Markey mouse or get in line Lychie.
Their resumes are at the least, unassuming.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Andrew Sylvia

3:09 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Comments have been deleted due to violations of the terms of use.

Reply

Mr White

3:36 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

I heard, due to his lingering ineffectiveness during Katrina that it was actually Bush's fault that the lights went out during the Super Bowl, who knew?!?

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

10:52 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Don't have an ounce of faith in either of these two slackers, am very disappointed to learn of Brown's decision, then of Tiesel's(sp) opting out, so who's left. Healey, but she's out too now. Gomez? Don't know much about him but willing to learn. Anyone but these two clowns! And Tyler, answer Ron's question, please, about whether you ever have or will even consider voting for anyone who is not a Dem ... be interested to know, tho I think I already do. Anyway ... !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

8:10 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Anna: I vote strictly Democrat, all the time . Voted for President Obama twice, and Elizabeth Warren . Will vote and support Ed Markey for US Senate against a weak field of Republican would-be's that could not run for dog catcher. As to the Dems,I mentioned,so did the majority of Americans and MA voters. All won. I don't do Republicans to answer your question.
Anna: now answer the same question. And if you claim " independence/ examine each candidate on his/her merits" , then tell me the last Democrat you voted for.

Comment_arrow

linda

9:24 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Tyler - that's it in a nutshell. People like you who just vote the party!! Did you ever think of looking at the person for once! I guess that would mean you voted for Duval twice and are happy with the continued tax and spend mentality!!

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

9:36 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Happy?

Mini-Me for president!

;)

Comment_arrow

Cecil Moore

9:00 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Tyler,

President Obama ran his campaign specifically for people with your party line affiliation. "Re-elect Barack Obama...don't think, just vote". Before you attack, I voted for JFK, Clinton, Kerry, and Miceli. I always try and keep an open mind so that I can intelligently cast my vote. It is sad that others don't.

Comment_arrow

Stiv

5:54 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Hey Vincent,

How did that Mitt-mentum work out for you?

Tyler Jozefowicz

7:54 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Sam: tell us what you did in January to better the plight of us Americans, since you raised the question.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

9:56 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Tyler,

When faced with a hungry man, the liberal Democrat will give him a fish and gain a dependent voter for life. The conservative Republican will teach the man to fish, and liberate him. What have you done for the plight of Americans?

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

2:45 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

That's a fair question, Tyler. Last month, I gave blood, volunteered at a soup kitchen, and volunteered my time to help disadvantaged youths prepare for the SAT. Not trying to promote myself, just showing I believe in what I write. All of us should volunteer and help others. Most differences happen at the local level, and very often have nothing to do with who has power in Washington.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

4:43 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Pimperton: When faced with a hungry man , the Republican will ship his job overseas to make a few more bucks so he can join the country club.

Comment_arrow

Ron

4:56 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

TJ, When faced with a hungry man, the Democrat will creat an Agency with holes, raise taxes on the middle class, fill the program with unqualified family membders, friends, and hacks, them miss manage the Agency.

Wind Dummy 25

1:53 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

You know, Tip O'Neil would wouldn't recognize any of these Lib lemmings...No soul, no backbone no truths...It use to be about the working slob around here getting a fair shake, and we worked very hard. Now its about what can the working suckers do more so I can sit on my arrss and collect. The Libs couldn't make it as a party, so they grabbed a once stand up party...Contributing 590 % nadaa to the cause is the short term death rattle and what's wrong for the future of the Republic in every possible way. It will eventually doom the Democratic socialist party. And that's a shame to the word Democrat.
You will hear the true 99% pushing around the snow this weekend so the barley 50% can get to work Monday so everyone can pay their bills Tuesday. The rest who support this collect nonsense can kiss my a>>. I am still looking for true leadership in this state. Ed King Bill Weld Paul Tsongas Ray Flynn Ed Brooks.Mitt Romney.
Markey was a below average creep in High school and a sneaky cheat. What makes any of you who support him think he has changed all these obscured years since then?

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

9:10 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Tyler, I'm independent for sure and I do vote on the merits of the individual and I sadly, ashamedly admit that I stupidly voted for Al Gore once. I still can't believe I did but we all make mistakes. I knew what your answer would be and I admire your allegiance and loyalty but I think that Wind Dummy made some good points above. The Dems are not what they once were and I wonder if there's any going back. I strongly doubt it and I cannot agree with most of what they do or say and Markey running for senator is a joke. I might accept Lynch, I do think he's more of a worker but even he makes me cringe. Not because I particularly don't like him, I just strongly believe that MA needs newer blood and 2 parties. We don't have an iota of differing opinions as it stands now; I know you are happy in your DEM world, but I honestly think it's best for us to have diverging opinions on issues and leaders who honestly take their constituency's interests at heart when making decisions, not bowing and cow-towing to any party's desires. Just a simple matter of principle for me. If a person is elected to do a job for the people, that is what he/she should do, not align themselves with a party for the sake of the party. Does that make sense to you?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

12:01 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Another thought Tyler ... I just cannot support people, D or R, who are in politics for the advancement of there personal careers and agendas. That was never the intent of our forefathers, men of that time served for a while then returned to their private lives, farmers many of them, and that's not at all what's going on now. I truly, in my heart of hearts, respect and admire Truman, a simple soul who was thrust into his term because of circumstances, yet stood up to the challenge and did well, then went home and became the ordinary citizen he always was. Can almost (note: almost) say as much for Carter, with limits. Lots to be said for the man/woman who tries to meet the needs of those they are appointed to serve rather than look to their personal development. And, sorry to say, that is exactly what I see in most of our reps today, in both parties. So we do the best we can in understanding them and choosing whoever we think might better serve us but we really can never be sure. I am not naive enough to expect we can ever go back to more virtuous times but I simply cannot understand how or why folks feel so secure in their beliefs since I am always ambivalent and careful in weighing the choices before me. But, then, we are all different in our beliefs and in what forms them. So it is and so be it. Makes for interesting discussion, if nothing else.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

4:48 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Anna: you remind me of a large group of politically astute " independents" that always keep an "open mind", loftier than the Party people . But when election time comes , they always swing to the right. If Jesus Christ were here, he would be a liberal, community organizer, not a CEO, country club type Republican. Rev Plimpton can cite the Bible quotes to confirm that.

Jon Scarborough

10:47 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

apparently "Mike" has superior intelligence and is not too slow in preaching that to everyone. He must have a ring that everyone else should kiss. What a boor.

Reply

Mike

1:05 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Thanks, Jon. I try to counter silly posts with fact-based ones, especially since it takes all of two or three minutes to actually find those facts. And with flu and cold season raging, ring kissing is extremely unsanitary; please allow me to suggest an alternate location for you to kiss.

Reply

E

1:37 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Tierney should just go "All In"

Why not....he is a gambling man.

At least we know he will not propose any new laws.

E

Reply

Wind Dummy 25

3:06 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Anna great great points...I have been an Independent voter myself and have been for a quite awhile. Happily it's by far the largest of all the parties in the state and steadily growing, we just need candidates of quality to actually step up...Sadly there is probably no going back to true Democrat values so sorely needed, in this state anyway.
It is good in a dark way, that the progressive ways are now almost fully exposed. I thought we learned this BS back in the old dazes of stagflation and misery indexes. Oh well history is lost on peoples that don't value lessons learned. It will take a lot of time & efforts now to climb out of this malaise of one party representation with it's choking repeated corruptions.

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

7:38 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

Vincent DiRico ... wherever have you been? Have missed your wry humor >:).

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

3:25 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

And where are you, Paul ... your observations would be welcomed by me if no one else.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

4:54 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I will vote for whoever puts the big banks and cohorts on Wall Street out of business for creating the economic collapse which has put millions of families out of work, their homes and into bankruptcy for the last 10 years and counting.

If Warren doesn't hammer them out of their game--it won't matter who the best candidate is--it will be whoever can be bought by the evil brood who belong behind bars. I hope she can at the very least freeze their assets and put it all back into the U.S. Treasury where it belongs.

Brown and Markey--no chance they will do the right thing for the working middle class. Lynch I believe can do it and if Capuano runs for Governor, the two may have a good chance of keeping our state from sinking into the corporate/banking cesspool which is solely responsible for ruining millions of innocent lives.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steven Sadowski

12:16 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

SG:
You do realize the collapse was caused by two factors: 1.) the housing bubble encouraged by the govt. through the CRA vis a vis Carter and Clinton and 2.) the derivatives trading based upon the bundles of said mortgages into vulnerable govt. agencies and govt. approved banks?

Wind Dummy 25

6:05 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

You'd have to start with Frank /Todd, actually Clinton & Jimmah Carter way back to the Community Reinvestment Act...Remember banks are not in the business of lending mortgage money to folks that have no $$'s or abilities to pay it back. But if you command them to make it happen, well thus was born The Trillion-Dollar Bank Shakedown That Bodes Ill for Cities. You may get the picture that they did their best with a crap bill and bad press to do what they do to stay profitable.
Liz Warren the meek, doesn't have a chance...It would be like trying to explain Obama care to a 105 year old hermit. Most know that Real Estate is valuable, more valuable to middle class then these dopes realized till lately, but don't why?
Politicians are way out of the loop when it comes to banking. And banking is retail, money is retail. They mean well but they are not skilled in banking or retail...
No offense Girl but>>>
Your looking under the wrong rock...It was a vast extortion scheme against the nation's banks. It's a long boring read like Obama care but it's important to understanding why we're stuck now.
http://www.city-journal.org/html/10_1_the_trillion_dollar.html

Reply

SomervilleGirl

7:04 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

A local pol testified at the statehouse a few years ago told me that people from Belmont were salivating over E. Somerville real estate which was slated as foreclosure. Signs were posted with a circle and line drawn through which means, "don't save it if it burns to the ground", homes with families still living inside.

Don't tell me this was not a deliberate plot to wipe out the low to moderate income families to make way for the enterprising gangsters who are hell bent on turning our cities into condo-hell. Some of our families worked very hard to keep our HOMES because we love the place we live and don't subscribe to the house flipping of out-of-towners because they have no respect for others unless they are part of the same club and only care about how fat their bank account is, the car they drive, the college they can boast about--it all means nothing, unless you are a person of good character. Thieves and Villains come in all colors and collars, but some are able to pay their way out of a tough spot so please save your BS for someone who has no idea about such matters, like probably your friends. When the chips are down, the people of worth will survive whatever life tosses their way, the others will go crying to mom and dad for the trust fund and family lawyer.

Bernie Sanders-Corp tax evaders

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sknt-UBRhxo

http://www.counterpunch.org/2009/10/21/the-next-financial-crisis-hits-wall-street-as-judges-start-nixing-foreclosures/

Reply

SomervilleGirl

7:15 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Capuano demanding answers about CDO's
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6Im9W4gwNc

Alan Grayson audit the fed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE3oiKuU8UI

Grayson and Kohn--where is the money?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj0JAfq4esk

"Government has coddled, accepted, and ignored white-collar crime for too long," he testified. "It is time the nation woke up and realized that it's not the armed robbers or drug dealers who cause the most economic harm, it's the white collar criminals living in the most expensive homes who have the most impressive resumes who harm us the most. They steal our pensions, bankrupt our companies, and destroy thousands of jobs, ruining countless lives." He testified to Rep. Gary Ackerman-D-NY that he has never been compensated for his efforts. "I did it for our flag, for patriotism."[29] Markopolos presented recommendations to improve the SEC's operations, which included mandatory department standards: good ethics, full transparency, full disclosure, and fair dealing for all. [30] The SEC must establish a unit to accept "whistleblower" tips, and move its activity closer to financial centers away from Washington, D.C.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Markopolos

Reply

SomervilleGirl

7:18 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Dummy--
Savings & Loan scam happened under Reagan's clock, Bush was ENRON. We have hundreds of wealthy elitists who refuse to pay taxes and have been running outsourced companies in other countries for years, while committing tax evasion and hiding our tax money in the Cayman's and USB. How do explain the hundreds who got scammed on hedge funds or fraudulent triple A investments? I guess we don't want to air the dirty laundry of those who are educated and should have known better, but it's okay to trash the unsuspecting low income and working class who didn't get the memo, "don't buy that junk, it's a scam". So far, the Republican party has done everything to shrink the working class into oblivion, and luckily we still have a few good Democrats who actually give a damn about people of their constituency, unlike those who only believe in how much they love their sacred golden COWS $$$.

Some of us who are actually paying attention have learned some things about how the "corporate owned" media puts a spin on things so the masses will remain confused about who the good guys are who haven't stopped working for the working class. Those of you who keep believing your real estate is actually worth something--think again. As long as Wall Street and their co-horts in banking have anything to do with it, it will always be a fairy tale and you are being played, as the 50 million homeowners who got ROBBED. Have enough for retirement in your 401k-that other fairy tale?

Reply

SomervilleGirl

7:31 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I don't hear anything about those shrewd developers and construction owners who flip homes at warp speed only to raise the bar and keep home prices through the roof--literally!

I guess it's okay for only those who knew exactly what they were doing--intentionally stealing to profit as Romney did with hundreds of companies--cashed out and left the investment to ruin and decay, thousands lost their jobs. Many cheated, robbed and cashed out on real estate, they too could not afford, but they were big business owners so it didn't matter and hey, it's called a new twisted form of capitalism at it's best, right? "All for me and who cares about anybody else". Is this what they are teaching in the so called BEST SCHOOLS?

The memo you didn't get is the working class people of this country are fed up and those who learned the hard way never got any bailouts--they are still on the hook for hundreds of thousands or have ruined their credit for life. Tell that to the CEO and executives who got their CORPORATE WELFARE CHECKS paid by the AMERICAN TAXPAYERS OF THIS COUNTRY.

You think that is fair? Not enough to make $700k working for AIG, the other Fat Loser Albatross which housed congressional pensions--nice sort of blackmail, ey?
"If they don't bail us out, they risk their own retirements", way to go! They also got double-digit million dollar bonuses they did not deserve, all while the rest of us sit back and wait to be taxed for the next three decades for their GREED.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patricia

9:18 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Sommerville Girl, you do realize that many of these wall streeters and bankers you despise are now part of the Obama administration? You do realize that people like Corzine will never see inside of a jail cell because he was a huge Dem contributor? In fact, Obama almost lined him up for Sec of Treasury.

Your facts on Romney are wrong, you obviously don't know what investment firms do.

Wind Dummy 25

9:42 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Hey Girl your preaching to the choir...I grew up on Bromfield Rd on the 2nd floor row.
I have my own business and do what I do to keep up...No trust funds or that BS...
I trust neither party and align with neither. I loath the stout wallet as well as the BS artist that claim they will lighten it for the lean.
Your job as well as mine is to keep pace or we will be over run by both. Expose both and hand it off to the next.
Your hoping that the the latest elected champion will actually keep her promise? Continue to hold your breath...I'm sorry to say she is just like the rest. She made her cake the old fashion way...Exploiting poor slobs in Real estate. Set up by the same folks who talked the talk but etc. The only way you'll see action is to get smahhtah peeps who are already 10 steps ahead of these phonies. You know been there done that Some one with yours and my values.
Elizabeth and Bruce weren’t so much lending money to family members, as going into business with them for profit. This is completely understandable– unless you have partially built a campaign around the evils of “predatory” banks and the individuals who exploit foreclosures.
You buy your property, guard it, keep it up, invest wisely in it, work hard and sell it when you retire. Just like our folks did. Simple plan and hopefully your neighbors do also. You may get lucky and find several properties that work. And then you vote for people that do the same. Beware of the politician who has a better idea.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

10:08 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Okay, Wind--
You've made your point, as I said before, whoever puts the bums behind prison, takes away their stolen assets has my vote regardless of what they have done in the past. What I am concerned about is what is done in the present and future. If you look hard enough, you will find ugly skeletons in every politicians closet. How do think they get there? By being honest, perfect without flaws? Not likely, when they are forced to lie down with dirty-dogs who help them get to where they want to be. I know people who have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in what would have been their pension, some firefighters who know they can't ever get it back and don't have some quick way of making fast cash like those scumbags on Wall Street and their bankster pals in crime. The housing scam is a complex story and we don't even know the half of it and they like to keep it that way. They lured in just about everyone they could convince and anyone who dared to stop them would end up with a 17 year old hooker in the back seat of his limo--remember that story? Eliot tried to stop them and look how far he got. I suspect the stolen money is now wrapped up in real estate development and that's why there is a big push to build condos, but not many people know about the shoddy work that goes on, over-priced junk, then again, some have money to burn, so they will just go buy another one. I was under the impression, you were defending the ilk who are steamrolling locals out of town.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

10:20 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Bush allowed huge tax cuts to his wealthy friends, then he allowed outsourcing which cost us millions of jobs, then they brought the ATM home equity bonanza cash outs and told everyone their homes would be worth millions of dollars and not to worry about Greenspan's rates because they would not change. I was also there at the statehouse several years ago to tell my own story, that was after my layoff and was out of work for two long years without healthcare or enough money to pay for a broken burner to heat my tenants apartment. I was forced to take out retirement and now paying back to loan sharks. All of this, and caring for an elderly parent, who was being exploited by the medical profession and drug companies who are treating our elderly worse than cattle. When you take a good look at how nursing homes operate, you can see how corporate greed has gone too far. How would you like to be called at 3 a.m. to be told your mother has just passed away and you need to come immediately because the bed is needed for another patient. Cha-ching. I guess losing that one day revenue must be some tough break. There is no respect, consideration or compassion. It's only about wealth, status, ruthlessness. I've also raised two kids mostly on my own and have worked since I was a teenager. Unless you experienced some hard times by the Wall Street brood, you really don't understand the issues. The working class is under attack, but everyone pretends like things are so grand--far from it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patricia

9:28 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Don't know where to begin with this post. Bush was not solely responsible as you are aware. People who used their equity in their home were idiots and have no one to blame.
Why wouldn't you go to the nursing home if your mother passed? I don't get that part of your post at all.

So you have apartments you cannot afford and this is our problem, how? Sounds like you are in over your head and looking to blame someone.

I can agree with some of your frustration but your wildly pointing fingers

SomervilleGirl

10:33 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

My neighborhood has changed for the worst. I still have some local neighbors left, but most are disgusted with what has become obvious. The newcomers pretend the locals don't exist and go out of their way to make us feel inferior. I have one particular neighbor who is worst of all--their attitudes of entitlement are unbelievable, bordering pathological neurosis. Everything they do is laced with "how do I increase my home value", but one would think it stops at their property line--it does not. They actually try to get us all to go along with their sick game. I've been approached about what color I am painting my house, color of my mulch, how much I am trimming my tree, to siding with them over re-planting sidewalk trees after a storm, when concrete was used so no one would get hurt. Then it was the snowplow dropping snow in their driveway, when they have enough money to pay someone to plow them out. They verbally attack the neighbor's landscaper if he uses the leaf blower. WTF--I'm not living in STEPFORD and neither are they--Wellesley is not Somerville, time to move back. I've known some of my local neighbors since I was a young girl. There are many in this town who have had really hard lives. Those are the real heros, not these self-absorbed, annoying idiots with too much time on their hands to bother and insult those of us who just want a peaceful home to live in. I had a long talk with a local neighbor yesterday who shared the same views. They have never experienced HOME.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

10:51 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

At least a working class person has the guts to tell it like it is--you only get smiling faces from the other side who will talk about you behind your back and pretend that they want to be your neighbor. I'm planning to build a 6 foot shadow-box fence this summer so I can keep my privacy and block out the nasty snobs. I'm betting they just might fight me on it at city hall because it may be of great concern regarding their property value. I use to be more patient than I am now with people of ignorance, but lets hope they don't ask me anything this summer. They won't like my response. Well, you know what they say, what goes around--let's hope it happens swiftly and to the right people this time. It's long overdue. Money can't buy happiness and it can't buy principles or respect either, somethings need to be earned. I found a great quote today listed by a friend--tells it all: "THE ILLITERATE OF THE 21st CENTURY WILL NOT BE THOSE WHO CANNOT READ AND WRITE BUT THOSE WHO CANNOT LEARN, UNLEARN AND RELEARN". Alvin Toffler

Reply

Wind Dummy 25

11:07 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Nahh Hell now...Actually I am an Inspector and find flipped sh@t all the time. Some I see do very VERY good work with junk. I also see flippers that out do junk WITH junk. I protect clients privately, there is nothing I can do except advise my clients. I do report unsafe conditions to the relevant authorities as I'm bound to, which is suppose to trigger the locals. Now what they do after that is some cases -your dead on...Political? Maybe, I can tell you this, some town / cities are better than others in that regard. Some not so much and if I follow up by chance because there is so much of it, I find it fades to gray many times.
You can't run these people to jail. I would if it were up to me. But, BUT! as everyone finds out eventually, the cost$$ are in the efing lawyers. Literally a money fight. Who can outlast the other. I don't care what level, it is the cost. Good intentions are more often out spent. Like If my champion I have my trust in gets even spotlighted in an embarrassing situation, ( like that guy in Jersey comes to mind as the latest) that's when my eyebrow goes up. Disappointing, yet we get these people cyclically all the time? There out of place first of all, and excuse me but everyone is approached immediately once they get in these slots that effect us all. It IS where the buck begins...The interesting buck? Well... Some how that trails ends abruptly. Where it ends up is is even more muddled.

Reply

Wind Dummy 25

11:19 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

I still like Kerry Healey or Gabriel Gomez, why?? Well one is a successful business person and with passionate values which I admire, also I would really love to see 2 women in those slots. That would be so incredibly cool. Talk about balance, so cool.
Gomez is very interesting and young. Love young blood in politics ...That's why Obama was interesting to me. As well as JFK & Brown. Gomez a Navy Seal and a crafty survivor who takes oaths seriously. Also someone I identify with completely, different branch, but brother in similar service, hence the handle "wind dummy" that kind of thing.
So far so good with them, we'll see. The other guys, I went to the same High School with Markey>>>Old time crook, what can I say I would never vote for him...Lynch some things I like. He is definitely more passionate than Fed Ed. I will watch him closely.
How was your storm? I was with MEMA this stormy weekend...HHmmmm, again what can I say different discussion...I'm a Guard guy also.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

11:42 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Wind,
In your line of work, I'm sure you have seen just about everything in housing. I heard from a reliable source that one of the condo-complex's was shoddy construction and headed to court, pending lawsuits by owners and city got involved as well. I don't know what came of that debacle, but I wondered who the company was that did the work and why it was allowed to come to such a disastrous outcome. This type of situation gives our town a bad name. As much as I can't stand many of the newcomers, all for good reasons, I don't like to see anyone get ripped off.

As far as GOP candidates, I would consider switching to independent if there was a chance of getting a moderate republican. I am convinced there are none to be had. From what I hear, they are never willing to negotiate terms in the house over anything for the working class and most are for the decades of wealthy tax breaks which I am opposed, especially since they lied to the administration about job creation which is nowhere in sight. Now they escape to Europe and beyond like the cowards they are, in the name of "we want a free ride", but really, they are afraid of the angry mob which may eventually hunt them down for the animals they are--I have zero sympathy for that scum. Dad always said "wars are only to make money for the capitalists" and he was right, history hasn't changed much. There was a time when the rich gave back to society--no more. The internet allows them to run a company anywhere on the planet.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

11:51 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Muffin-head married money, the other dude I have no clue about--being a Navy Seal is admirable, but does not make a well-rounded politician. They need more than military smarts to handle that crowd in DC. Maybe that is why JFK was so successful. My own dad ran with his dad and that crowd back in the day. I came along much later in his life and was told it was the first time he actually had time to raise a family. As much as people believed them to be criminals, the bootlegging days were times of survival of the fittest and James Michael Curley was one politician who knew how to take care of his constituency. The most frequented bar patrons were politicians, cops and judges. Wouldn't you love to hear what they had to say. When I asked my mother who dad had to deal with to rum run, she said he went to see a judge every Friday. How interesting--so who are the real crooks? "The Last Hurrah", was one of my favorite movies, because it showed just how far a good politician would go to fight for the working people--he made enemies with the bankers and elite who eventually brought him down due to his overwhelming popularity with his constituency.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

11:59 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

The storm was a challenge, but I went sledding and shoveled at the peak of high winds--great fun. MEMA came up during a conversation at work--tell them thanks, I got a day off! We have had a few military men in our family, CIA, NSA, politician, teamsters and constructor owners. I've only learned about dad's line of work and the intricate details of some of his alliances about 7 years ago. Interesting stuff and helps to understand the complexity of relationships and how sometimes innocent people can get hurt. GN..thanks for the spirited discourse.

Reply

Wind Dummy 25

12:32 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

So many excellent points Girl...My Dad and your Dad probably hung out.
Absolutely there is and always has been as you know, a murky world of low light with panky and blatant corruption in that world...But traceable, sometimes these slobs are exposed here & there...That's fairly satisfying to me but like anything not enough and we have poor attention spans.Tax breaks make the world spin in the name of compromise.
Independent is not that bad a world you'd like it...It scares the crap out of them and forces them out into the open for unwanted scrutiny.
They really are not the brightest people and will say anything unscripted if pressed. We need neutral and relentless scoop hungry media again. In our busy worlds we could & need to make better decisions. We are so caught up in party ID. To many of us tune out the needed personal debate before deciding. This division sh@t is what politics thrives on and encourages. Almost sports like...I would love to see little black ink tapes or voice suppressors over party affiliations before their names. Candidate tango vs candidate delta vs candidate bravo as they debate then see where we line up. There would be some snappy politicking I bet you 8 bucks...I'd like a better debate model also. Again media darlings...
Remember the reward for winning is to get into that club. Ask John Kerry, or that other grub from Illinois with the hair...Who got that liar pirate and why isn't that capable hero person US Attorney General
Good chat!

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

4:48 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

Somerville you sound like one disappointed girl and I certainly can understand why. One question, tho, referring to those who were caught up in foreclosures due to inability to pay their mortgages on houses they could ill afford to begin with ... how in Heavens name did they get sucked into the deals they made? Are they not at least partially to blame themselves for getting sucked into buying what they never could afford in the first place? I may be wrong but it seems to me that a clear-headed, thinking individual could never get so sucked in. We all have dreams and most of us work toward those dreams, not expecting an easy ride. Just a point for discussion here, not a challenge.

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

2:35 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Vincent DiRico ... devoured the utube post you recommended ... me too, I'm takin' the hi road (at least I will try):)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

6:35 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Vincent ... thought you'd like to know, the doctor was mentioned on WBZ last night and for the most part the consensus of the call-ins was that he'd never be welcomed to any function again. See what happens? You speak your mind sometimes, stand for justice, and you're blacklisted. I have viewed this video several times and cannot thank you enough for pointing us to it.

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

11:59 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Don't worry Anna, we are in the BLUEst of blue states. His thoughts/ideas will make it out into the sunshine. Hopefully these will soon find themselves in the bad idea dumpster:

Mini-Me's proposalS to raise taxES

Nancy Pelosi claimed it's a "false argument" to say the federal government has a spending problem

"At one point several weeks ago," Mr. Boehner says, "the president said to me, 'We don't have a spending problem.' "

...

One can hope!

SomervilleGirl

10:52 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Anna,
In order to understand the housing scam perpetrated by Wall St you have to keep an open mind--if you are retired, still earning a great income, have a healthy savings, healthcare, maybe a second home in Florida, kids are grown, married, gainfully employed, you have paid off their student loans--then it's easy for you to buy that story the corporate owned media has been telling everyone "the home owners did this to themselves".

The reasons vary and each story is individual, but mostly these loans were taken because their 401k's were not making enough since the inside trading morphed and SEC oversight was lacking better scrutiny, college loans had to be paid even though companies were closing and millions lost their jobs to outsourcing created by Wall Street and Master's of the Universe, aka MBA's from Harvard and other Ivy League Schools. Bain Capital and Mitt Romney's blueprints--same plan.

Some abused the system, but lawyers and mortgage companies were breaking the laws according to judges who were trying to come forward to expose their crimes. The judges knew that MERS, the electronic filing was invalid since legal documents, NOTES on mortgages must be dated, stamped, SIGNED & recorded properly. Millions were not & foreclosed homes were done illegally, this was FRAUD, but by the time they realized it, millions of homes were stolen by the criminal lenders, "robo-signers", (innocent workers) were told to process these foreclosures, lawsuits were filed.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

11:09 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

So Anna,
How do you feel about the bundled mortgages that were sold to investors around the globe and labled, "AAA" rating investments? Some lost millions. I guess we should say, "they should have known better not to invest in something they couldn't afford".

Does this work for the rich investor or just for the financially challenged middle class worker who believed the loan was legal, the advice given by the LICENSED mortgage broker and lawyer who took an OATH on ETHICS was HONEST and not scamming for $10k on commissions and thousands of dollars for 5 minute legal fees to sign bogus papers. Many of these loans are housed in overseas banks, not U.S. by thousands of investors who expected to be paid, but the bailouts went to the very same people who perpetuated the crime of the century.

If you don't know how this happened, you shouldn't judge the millions of homeowners. If anyone should have known better it was Madoff's investors who were gaining 400% on their returns and broke out the crying towels when the SEC finally stepped up. I guess if your son-in-law is working for the SEC, then who will bother to check on the Ponzie scheme? Just keeping in it all in the family. But the town mob couldn't wait to put a noose around Bernie's neck and his partner in crime was met by the midnight pool man and died of a heart attack waiting to face a judge about the billions he stole from his victims. Hey, when they make multi-million donations for decades--all is forgiven.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patricia

9:33 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Whoa here. I am also a single parent paying of kids college loans. If you are out of work, the loan providers will work with you. You can get a deference, but remember that you took out that loan and you agreed to pay it back.

People bought houses they could not afford. I haven't heard one instance yet of people being forced into mortgages they didn't want.

And please, how were you personally affected by Madoff? Or even wall street for that matter?

SomervilleGirl

11:18 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Wind,

Why do people not do the research? I've studied these issues since 911 and it's all clear to me. How else did they finance their homegrown war?

In 20 years, what will people say about the events of the past 10 years beginning with 911?

Remembering how people viewed the war in Vietnam--those opposed, many were "hippies", labeled as "freaks", "deadbeats", "draft-dodgers". At the time, conservatives believed the labels and also believed our country would be taken over by communism, years before they also believed Russia would over-rule our country. None of that came true. Pro-war propaganda, for what? What did we gain by the war in Vietnam? How many of our soldiers were sacrificed?

We look at this war now as one of the greatest mistakes of the last century and hippies were people who spoke out against those who promoted war, purely for the sake of making money. Some of us look upon the hippies of the 70's as hero's because they took to the streets to expose a tragedy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Antoine

2:30 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

SomervilleGirl - I'm not getting into the debate/discussion of your background, experience, and especially not GOP policies. I just care about the painting you made about Vietnam. I have to view my origins very complicatedly considering that I am born here making me a Vietnam-American means multiple histories as well that Vietnam is not North Korea - at least not since mid-1980's with its economy reforms.

Regardless of that, the narrative you painted is inaccurate. The Conservatives did have their point and much was vindicated. When Saigon fell, things went to suck for the country and for the lives of my parents. My family was sent to re-education camps, possessions was seized, and things like my mom's family business was call too capitalist. Claims about how it would affect neighboring counties came true too. Cambodia fell to Pol Pot and he did a genocide (and later made enemies with Vietnam leading to his removal).

The Liberal/Anit-war people was right that it was not "your" business. That it wasn't fair that soldiers was sent unwillingly to fight in a war that both sides have too many bad things to say either was the true good side. Yet, this does not mean your narratives is right. It is similar to the Korean War - the difference the North won and lucky Vietnam chose a better path than NK. Yet, it wasn't truly the US business and possible interests. So all I can was is my gratitude for trying regardless of motivation. And it is more complicated than you painted.

Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

6:28 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Apparently you have spent a lot of time studying these issues and I applaud you for all of your research. I want you to know that for the most part, I do agree with you. However, before I ever sign any document I read it extremely carefully ... that's all I'm saying. How in God's name does anyone get themselves into such predicaments unless they are careless and not reading all the print? Buying a home is not like buying a pair of shoes, it involves many years of, for some, deprivation to hang on to it, so care must be taken ... that's all I'm saying.

As for the hippies, my recollection is that they were hippies not so much because of their objection to the VN war, but because of the growing objections they had to authority of any kind, because of the growing expansion of the use of illegal substances and and their disregard for the generation that preceded them, many of them using the war as their excuse for their behavior. It was a very scary time for those with impressionable young children and parents really had to stand guard. That's what I remember most. The kids who objected to the war were mostly college students, not the hippies. And, I think we still have hippies in today's society, look around.

I, too, am a first generation American, my parents also scarred from their experience in Italy, starving, running, walking for days on end from burned villages, seeking hiding places. Makes me all the more appreciate this country, even with its flaws.

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

9:48 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Anna I agree, I have never been robbed by a bank, credit card company, ... liberal hogwash in order to take from the makers!

Architects of Ruin: How big government liberals wrecked the global economy---and how they will do it again if no one stops them

Peter Schweizer

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

9:49 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Book Description
Release date: October 6, 2009

Was the financial collapse caused by free-market capitalism and deregulation run amok, as liberals claim?

Not on your life, says Peter Schweizer. In Architects of Ruin, Schweizer describes how a coalition of left-wing activists, liberal politicians, and “do-good capitalists” on Wall Street leveraged government power to achieve their goal of broadening homeownership among minorities and the poor. The results were not only devastating to the economy, but hurt the very people they were supposedly trying to help.

This tale of liberal “Robin Hood capitalism run wild” has never been told. But more than just a story about the past, Architects of Ruin is also an urgent warning about the future. The very same people who planted the seeds of the collapse are back in Washington, determined to use the crisis they caused as cover for a massive overhaul of the American economic system. These people have learned nothing from their past mistakes and are busy applying the same methods to other sectors of the economy—health care, the auto industry, real estate (again!), and above all the promotion of “green” technologies—inflating bubbles that are sure to bring about another crisis. Ordinary Americans who foot the bill for the last state-capitalist bubble have reason to be afraid—very afraid—of the inevitable result.

Comment_arrow

Patricia

12:04 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Sommerville Girl, shut up about Vietnam. You know nothing relevant. Do yourself a favor.

I lost a family member in Vietnam and the last thing I want to read is someone who "studied". Well, we lived it.

Comment_arrow

Olive Yew

2:33 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Patricia,

No need to tell anyone to shut up here. SomervilleGirl, did not say anything to dishonor the sacrifice of your family member. Do yourself a favor. Take a breath before you click submit next time, and you'll prevent yourself from coming through as a dolt.

Comment_arrow

Patricia

2:53 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

To Olive Yew: Yes, I am offended. People using dead American Soldiers to make cheap political points when they know nothing of what they speak of is very offensive.

Get a gripe and think of others

Comment_arrow

Olive Yew

3:14 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Patricia, Can you please point out in your next comment what SomervilleGirl said to cause you to have such a gripe with her comments on Vietnam.

Calling her political point of view cheap is offensive to me. Should we not express any views on politics because we lost soldiers in the Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, Iraq War, and Afghanistan? These soldiers died protecting that freedoms we are currently applying to his site.

I certainly have a grip on things over here.

Paste this link in your browser. http://imgur.com/fGelg

Comment_arrow

Patricia

3:36 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Olive Yew: Enough. You made your point and I made mine. Can we agree to disagree?

Comment_arrow

Olive Yew

3:42 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Patricia,

You never made a point, we can both agree on that.

SomervilleGirl

11:29 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Wind--

Small world indeed, our dad's running in the same circles, no doubt. I've learned a great deal about people and myself over the past 10 years.

One of the best lesson's of all--never judge anyone. You never know when life will throw you a curve ball.

People I can't tolerate--the ignorant, the self-centered and those who believe that playing it safe and having lots of money is going to keep them from destiny.

All that matters in this life is true friends who you can count on, a loving family and your own courage, perseverance and determination to survive what comes next. Everything else is just an illusion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

8:25 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Just to be clear S-Girl ... I am not standing in judgement of anyone. I am simply making an observation based upon my experience in financial and legal matters. You are right, the truly important things in life are family and personal integrity. As for friendships, they can be fickle at times but it's good to have them and nice to know you can count on them for support when needed.

SomervilleGirl

5:34 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Antoine,

First, let me say I am sorry for the hardship and pain this reminder may have caused. I was using the war in Vietnam as an analogy of the war in Iraq. Like you, I am first generation American. Both my parents experienced the horrors of Nazi occupation in N. Italy and both were emotionally scared due to the devastation it caused. I wrote a blog about it on this site because it's important for me to learn what happened during that time period which shaped my parents in ways separate from the people they once were.

We are very fortunate unlike other countries to not be faced with invasions and outcomes of war. The wars on our land were fought centuries ago. I believe many of these wars are purely political in nature and not due to other reasons. I was a young girl when the war in Vietnam began, but I never understood why it went on for so many years, and why our president was later assassinated. There are too many questions which remain unanswered for me to feel comfortable with what has been stated in the press. Why do we hire assassins who later become our enemies? Why do we put evil dictators in power, only to take them out when they no longer serve our purpose?

I understand wars are complicated and if we are sending our troops to foreign nations to fight for their freedoms, why are millions of innocent lives lost in the battle? We should be spending money to save lives not destroy them.

I'm sorry if I offended you, it was not my intention.

Reply

Hammertime

3:06 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Lynch all the way! We need a change, Markey has been part of the establishment and like most who have been in Washington have forgotten what it is like to have to work everyday.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patricia

3:44 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

I agree. I could go for Lynch but admit that Winslow is looking pretty good. Anyone but Markey.

Anna Bucciarelli

4:26 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Patricia ... you made excellent points, inspiteof Olive's remark that you didn't. I have to tell you that I really had to tame my own anger about the VN remarks since my husband served in that war and we lost a few very close friends, so I fully understand your upset. I work hard to keep a lid on my thoughts because I can get very carried away and I prefer to take the high ground and avoid confrontation, try not to insult, but I absolutely appreciate your sentiments. One point you made that caught my attention, aside from VN, because I had the same one ... how bad can life be if you have a tenant? The thing, as I see it, is that this country offers us all so much and if we don't like things, we can work for change. It's not enough to gripe and moan as it gets us nowhere and things slide down the tubes if we don't become active. If S-Girl is so disgruntled as she appears to be, she could genuinely work for change ... she seems to have a lot of information, some eroneous,(SP?) and I agree with some of her comments but most is blustering and she sounds downright angry directing it to all who have worked to better themselves and are financially stable. That's what I read in all of her comments. She says not to judge, but that is exactly what she does. So, dear heart, you spoke well and for me too.

Lynch over Markey, but i'm not nut about him either ... still want a diverse MA Gov., would be good for everyone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sand Man

6:28 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

I beileve SomervilleGirl has been around the block a few times and has paid her share of dues. If she has criticisms of the powers-that-be, especially the ones that helped bring about the Great Recession, they rise above and beyond being merely "disgruntled"....

Comment_arrow

Patricia

3:38 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Thanks for your kind words Anna.

Wind Dummy 25

6:08 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Yes girl, small world indeed.
I think you stubbed a few ingrown toes with the Nam thing...Esshh.My dimes worth.
Nam taught us many things about ourselves. All of us who know the pain of that war realize that the U>S> became fallible. But the cause was just, as it is today. Anyone who thinks not is unbalanced. Would we go in again if it was the same scenario? They'd need a better excuse than Tonkin. Would it be worth our blood? Is Syria? What about Iran... Israel? South Korea, California, how about Europe... When and where do we put up the wall.
We are capitalists and we need global free trade partners. There is no trade without free exchange. Try trading with someone with no money...We fight, bleed and die for a way of life chose long ago. A chance for a way better life. For instance our poorest American would live as a King in any sh@t hole country. American blood is precious, but not to enemies. We may have learned to much since Nam. I feel our enemies have.
The fact that we do sacrifice our own in conflict to keep commerce moving keeps hope alive in desperate places. Some insist there is a better way, but see I none that transforms into the lack of threats. This earth would be a dark place without the U>S> and commitment. Playing nice nice is not a strategy. Ask someone who has to deal with it.

Gomez has committed, I will sign his papers. He will do the job in plain sight with proven dignity/honor. What's better than that?
Markey shows up when it benefits him.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

6:21 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Watch "Inside Job", NETFLIX.
Details those responsible who stole billions from victims forced to take loans as a matter of survival--extended layoffs, medical bills, college loans, etc. If you still don't believe this was intentionally done to wipe out the middle class & keep millions in poverty without any opportunity for financial sustainability--you must have never experienced any of the hardships I have outlined & don't care to understand the real issues. When people are out of work & their moderate cost of living exceeds the $8 hr. job at CVS, that is unacceptable. I was laid off for 2 yrs., could not find a job, through no fault of my own, now back to work. It was due to the swindling by investments firms which tanked the market. Large companies saw an opportunity to save even more, layoff middle aged replaced w/ younger workers. Those who filed for bankruptcy due to excessive loss is acceptable--not the rest. It was used as an excuse to increase their already too big to fail bottom line. When the investment firms lost billions, they went crying to the govt. for taxpayer funded bailouts. Do you actually condone that decision? You would prefer to side with a sleezy firm who knew they were cheating millions of homeowners & investors, over a family that became homeless! When homes sat vacant, the mortgage co's let the town budgets go bust-RE tax losses, damages.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_Job_%28film%29

http://www.theotherschoolofeconomics.org/?p=2499

Reply

SomervilleGirl

6:38 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

You are missing the point. I am happy for people who are financially stable. Let's see if they can stay there without the corrupt entities finding more ways to take it away from those who have it. Why do you think the rich don't want to pay their share in taxes and have jumped ship to go embrace the Eiffel Tower and Big Ben!
Some have even renounced their US citizenship because the free market overseas let's them do whatever they please.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8334-505143_162-57469075/5-citizens-who-left-the-u.s-to-avoid-paying-tax/

Google search is great, you should try it sometime.

As far as the Vietnam War or any other War is concerned--I have said nothing about the brave soldiers who put their life on the line to serve. I have three veterans in my own family who served in Korea, WWI & WWII. Also a nephew who was on the grassy knoll and worked for the govt, at the American Embassy in Mexico. They all gave their lives for this country and were proud to serve.

What I am pointing out is the callous behavior by those who wage war in the name of freedom--they rob innocent people of their lives, their natural resources (IRAQ's oil & Afghanistan gas pipe line) and their dignity. They put millions of young men in harms way all in the name of greed. By what my family members have shared with me and my father, war is another complicated matter--but the bottom line is war never solved the world's problems. JFK wanted world peace, but he too died in violence.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

6:42 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Wind, Sand & Olive--
I think they should change the title of this blog to LYNCH MOB....M--E--O--W....!!!!
And I thought some of the women at work were a rough crowd...YIKES..

Reply

SomervilleGirl

6:44 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Can't we all just get along? Maybe someone should start a knitting circle--just be sure to leave the spears at home...

I'm entitled to my own opinions as anyone else......did I mention I was captain of a debate team?

Reply

SomervilleGirl

6:54 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Wind,

I respect your comments and know you speak the truth, yet I am a free spirit who prays for world peace. Call me a hopeless idealist, a naive independent thinker, an outspoken woman who will challenge anyone worthy to a verbal dual. Trust me--I like to be proven wrong because I crave knowledge every minute of each day. No moss here.

I'm sorry if my bringing up Nam hit a sore spot. What's important to healthy dialogue is to be able to debate without insult--your constructive thoughts are much appreciated.

I believe it's important to be proud of one's own country--but when the leaders refuse to lead and industry abandons its people who have worked so hard just to attain a simple life, when children cannot receive an education worthy of sustaining their life as an adult--I ask you, when do the people rise up and demand long-overdue change?

Reply

Wind Dummy 25

11:24 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Girl your passion is blurring my screen.
I'm a 25+ year Infantry soldier, hash marks down to the floor. More deployments than Custer had Indians...Now hiding in the Guard. No one loathes war & all it's disruptions / horrors more than people like me or people I know or have known. Spirits are not free. Not in the US. Be determined and keep your self planted in what's important & in your control. Once you have that you can act. Choose one fight, contribute and follow up.
We would love to trust our leaders. I do but only in immediate theaters. The politics of war are extremely untrustworthy. I, or we never stuck necks out for any president or politician or band music. Presidents etc know this! I trust in todays intell.
We do what we do for ourselves, family and the American people a better way of life. We trusted leaders to hand us a sane plan that mattered only in the moment.Think about that.
As times change and the promise to do better, the more punishing we get towards each other. This is repetitive BS.
The American people need to understand that and take a lesson from people that put it on the line. Demand better not idiologies, don't look at each other as some minion of some party or less knowledgeable. There is simple life in America, if your detached and don't read up on history.
Industry is key, it is the engine. When you ef with it all is cooked.
I urge you to keep looking and stay in the game demand accountability,
this present situation is a disappointment.

Reply

SomervilleGirl

5:24 am on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Wind,

A wise friend worked on WS, brought me up to speed on the matters of global politics - $ issues, wrought w/ complexities beyond comprehension. We bantered about the parties at first, 4years later, we agreed on most topics. Although a man of some privilege, a heart of gold and mind to envy. He convinced me of two important truths--"There is only one deeply flawed party, not two, who really work together". And, "The rich once created jobs and kept our economy vibrant--this is no more. Now we deal with the nouveau riche' crowd who give back NOTHING and expect everything". Back in 2006 when we had our deepest financial cliff hanger as wide as the Grand-C, I would ask, "How bad is it", his response, "It's only going to get worse". He was spot on every time. This exchange went on for 4 years until finally the double-digit, trillion dollar toxic mortgage floodgates burst. By the time we parted ways, we were disappointed in both parties, financial sectors, local politicians and people who continued to blame those not responsible. To this day, I consider him a great friend. He opened my eyes to the world I refused to see--a reality many people cannot understand because it's just to hard to accept. I use to be there once, now I know I can no longer live in that illusion. We only have the power to change ourselves and the opinions of those we admire should be paramount.

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

1:03 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Just so you know, S-Girl, the fact is that the so-called "rich" do pay taxes according to tax laws, which I believe need major repair, so they're only taking advantage of what's offered them as would anyone. Here's the thing, I don't find fault with all you say and I recognize your passion and can well appreciate it. I just think you need to calm down. I really try very hard to keep my words soft and sweet just in case I need to eat them later.

Sand man, we've all been around the block, some of us many times. I am not ridiculing S-girl, just making my own observations from her words. I believe it's best to be vague rather than unkind and not hurt the feelings of passionate folks. I hope I've achieved that here.

We are so off topic ... I'm out of here (for now, anyway).

Reply

Gene Pinkham

1:27 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

My good friend who writes in the Malden Observer listed some of Markey's "accomplishments". The last seems to have occurred in 1997. I pointed out that that was 16 years ago. Markey should run on TeleCom City again.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

3:49 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

I'm back! Just to remind those who don't remember ... the bailouts were instituted by the Fed. Gov. Companies asked, why wouldn't they, but "yes" didn't need to be the answer. I was for letting them go bankrupt ... they would have restructured in time on their own.
"Nuff said.

Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

3:50 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Gene ... did your good friend happen to mention exactly what the accomplishment was? Curiouser and curiouser.

Anna Bucciarelli

4:41 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Patricia ... referring to your comment to Tyler today, don't waste your time trying to tame his opinion of EW ... or any other Dem ... you must know he is a Dem worshiper and never even considers looking for another view of how things can be. He'll never budge an inch and loves nothing more than to portray all Republicans as devils incarnate. Well, to each his own I guess.

Reply

Wind Dummy 25

5:49 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Fed Ed was very busy with "Cap & Trade" for the last few years anyway...
Voting Record
From Jan 1977 to Feb 2013, Markey missed 887 of 21,651 roll call votes, which is 4.1%. This is worse than the median of 2.2% among the lifetime records of representatives currently serving. Some voting stats...
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000133/

Gomez is coming on already, young fresh and a business guy. It will be interesting and with a short time on this election to see how fast the personal pounding from the hypocrites begins. Uh Oh a Latino American Republican from Mass? Who knew?
A man with a backbone and proven leadership? The effete left will fear him, and fear will take shape as hate.
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2013/02/12/gabriel-gomezs-words-senate-candidate-spanish/

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

7:25 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Tyler ...just caught your comment of 2/16 @ 4:48 pm ... How'd I miss that one? Thought you were done with me but you love tweaking me as much as I do you it seems. Fact of the matter is that I am beholden to NO party and I pride myself on studying and standing for issues, not parties. Sorry, Tyler, you can accuse me of swinging to the right but you cannot prove it of me or anyone as much as you admit how far to the left you are. And that's just fine for you, I applaud you for your firm convictions, I just do not understand how you are always so sure. Nothing and no one is ever certain for me until I really need to get down to choice. There is no question in my mind that divergence of opinions is essential in arriving at meaningful legislation for the benefit of everyone, thus I believe we need more than a one-party commonwealth, where we can at least hope for clear-headed and thoughtful discussion of issues to come to good legislation. I know we don't see that in WA now and I am as disappointed as anyone but this country has been thru hard times in the past and we've come thru so I am ever hopeful for our future, for Gov't. to resolve all of their differences for all of our benefit. Wishful thinking? Perhaps, but what else can we hang on to except a glass that is half full? In the end, both parties have their puts & takes, you must agree to that at least? (Lynch is a much nicer (& better) guy than Markey, in my opinion.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

7:32 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Correction Tyler ... your comment of 2/26 (today, in fact), not 2/16. BTW, both your and Ron's hunger comments in response to Pimperton's tickled me.

Comment_arrow

Tyler Jozefowicz

8:20 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Anna: and you will be voting for whom? My pre-conceived notions are based upon your conservative commentary, flavored with the appearance of being clear minded and neutral. I am a liberal . Prove me wrong, for instance by saying something positive ( not sarcastic) about Obama's efforts to move the country, get something done , in spite of the" just say no to everything stuff" because Obama is a president that some will not recognize no matter what. It's not based on ideology either; it's based upon race and code words. I know because I frequent the inner circles of those racist types. They imbrace me as one of their own , feeling they are talking to a like minded indivudual;little do they know.

Comment_arrow

Vincent DiRico

9:31 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

The "my way or the highway" method is seldom used by a true/good leader. The current cuts came as a compromise from his admin and now he claims we have to choose between Armageddon or a tax increase, he is so cool Ricco Suave (sp) cool. History will evaluate him on the facts and it ain't looking good!

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

11:56 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Sad thing is that Tyler has no problem actually believing that while driving his gasoline power vehicle, living in a housing unit heated by an oil-fired boiler, and spending almost none of his money or time helping others -- unless "others" is a Democratic candidate for office. There are no bigger hypocrites than liberals, who I suspect are motivated to coerce others to behave in a certain way out of self guilt.

Comment_arrow

Ron Powell

11:59 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

And I guess that is the scariest thing about liberals: they have no intention of living the life that they want to impose on everyone. Everything is somebody else's fault and for somebody else to fix with somebody else's money. And if you don't agree, it's because you are "greedy" or "don't care."

Steven Sadowski

10:28 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

LOL. Stereotypically democrats want your money but want to give you the freedom to live as you wish and republicans want you to keep your money but want to tell you who can marry and how to live your life, but now with the democrats coming after our 2nd amendment, banning water bottles and large sodas and the republicans spending like drunken sailors (with an apology to drunken sailors) the two parties are morphing into one party of spending, confiscating, unconstitutional, big government apparatchiks. I laugh when liberals and conservatives fight. To think you actually believe you are not the same. Bush was hated by the left but how has Obama governed any differently? And Bush was lauded as a conservative but what's conservative about NCLB, TARP and unconstitutional wars? What a joke. Time for a 3rd party.

Reply

Anna Bucciarelli

11:01 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Not certain yet, Tyler.Still examining my options, unlike some who simply vote parties. Do not EVER infer that I am racist for you do not know a thing about me except what I place in these comments and I take my vote far too seriously to even consider ethnicity or race.I do not like Warren, does that make me racist?I am not crazy about Obama because I think he is far too full of himself and concerned with things that I consider to be an infringement on rights as written in our Constitution, and because he is one-sided in his conviction that only the poor and underprivileged, many of whom I don't believe are ill equipped to fend for themselves as we all do, are to be served as evidenced by his unending favoritism for them to the exclusion of the middle class he boasts he cares about. I don't believe him and I think he surrounds himself with folks who have like beliefs, which is his option as President and I don't begrudge him that but I don't agree and guess what? I don't have to, this is the United States of America and I am free to make other choices and to speak my mind. For me it is ideology, I am more than willing to support and help those in need and I do in many of my own ways, but I will not be taken advantage of.Yes, he will be remembered but at what cost to all of us? I am not aware of flavoring, simply stating my opinions.I do recognize him as President, but I am disheartened by his performance.He is not alone,I am disappointed in many of our appointed officials

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Bucciarelli

11:26 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

And, the nail in the coffin for me, is the Bengazi affair.What was our President doing during the hours (8, I believe) when that attack took place, why never a telephone call from him to Lybia, why the weeks of coverup and dodging the truth and whatever for? To save face, to help in an election that he was certain to win as history has shown that incumbents generally always win? No explanation is yet forthcoming and I cannot ever forget or forgive this as the most aggregious (sp?) misconduct on the part of our President, never mind the folks he appoints to handle things, he is the one in charge and the one who has sworn to protect and defend our Constitution and I interpret that to mean we the people as well. Surely, he cannot be at all places all the time, no one expects that, but in a crisis such as this his presence, his voice should have been heard by the folks involved in the terror act, givers and receivers of such butchery, and by talking to the Country. We do have radio and television available to him whenever he cares to avail himself. And, now, holding us hostage to this sequester, which will achieve nothing as far as the tremendous debt is concerned, will cut jobs, and the spending will continue, wait and see. No, Tyler, I see too much that I consider wrong, cannot find much to praise. Using his power above and beyond, threatening congress to have his way, not very savory or gentlemanly. However,he has a pretty wife and nice kids, give him that I will.

Wind Dummy 25

12:17 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

O what's his name was in bed during Benghazi gate, no clue...The clown car was already full so they blamed a burnt out old Hillery...
Bush was also in bed and unavailable for blaming s.The only thing they got correct.
Bubba owns their empty souls big time.

Reply

Gene Pinkham

3:17 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Something about washing machines that (don't get the clothes as clean) run more efficiently.

Reply

Leave a comment