patching...
Update: Get Medford's latest headlines in your inbox each morning—sign up for our free newsletter. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Medicinal Marijuana in Massachusetts: Yea or Nea?

Voters will be asked to decide in November.

 

(More: From Crime to Fine: How are Marijuana Penalties Working Out in Massachusetts?)

Should Massachusetts allow marijuana to be used and grown for medicinal purposes?

That's one question voters in the Commonwealth are expected to decide upon when they cast ballots in November.

The proposed ballot initiative calls for Massachusetts to allow doctors to prescribe marijuana to patients with chronic medical problems. It also calls for treatment centers to be created to cultivate and distribute the drug.

It isn't the first time Massachusetts voters have been asked to weigh in on marijuana law changes. In 2008, voters approved an initiative that reduced possession of small amount of marjuana from a criminal offense to a fine.

Attorney General Martha Coakley, the state's top law enforcement official, said in April that, if passed, the initiative is "going to cause a huge headache making sure it’s not abused." Still, her office is neutral on the initiative, she said.

  • What do you think about medicinal marijuana in Massachusetts?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • It's a good idea. It can help people in pain.
        264 (60%)
    • It's a bad idea. Enforcement would be a disaster.
        175 (39%)
    Total votes: 439
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: medicinal marijuana

Christine G

1:35 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

America is falling apart and the only ballots being put forward are for people to get high. This will have nothing to do with helping sick people in the long run. Just look at California for an example.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jillian Galloway

2:43 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Actually, you're wrong. People are *already* getting high - the prohibition doesn't stop that. The ballots being put forward are to prevent the $Billions that's spent on marijuana each year from going to organized crime and fueling the 10,000+ murders each year that the unrelenting demand for illegal marijuana causes.

When marijuana's legalized like wine the demand for illegal marijuana will be eliminated as people choose lower-priced, better-quality, LEGAL marijuana over the illegal, dubious-quality stuff currently sold by criminals on the street. When marijuana's legalized these people will disappear just as the bootleggers did before them.

Protect our Children - Drug Dealers Don't Card, Supermarkets Do!

Comment_arrow

Kevin Sterling

8:19 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Which thing in California should I be looking at? Should I be looking at the fact that between 1996 when the Compassionate Use Act was passed on Election Day and 2010 that the crime rate in California has fallen 42.07%? That's 22.87% better than the nation as a whole for the same time period. Don't forget that with 12% of United States citizens being California residents that the nationwide average benefits significantly from California's crime rate reduction.
http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/cacrime.htm
http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

Comment_arrow

Kevin Sterling

8:23 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

...or perhaps I should be looking at the fact that California's statistically significant reduction in the rate of "drugged" driving was a major factor in the statistically significant reduction in the nationwide rate of "drugged" driving between 2002 and 2009. Another interesting thing about the 2002-2009 time period is that the number of Californians claiming the protection of the Compassionate Use Act skyrocketed by at least a factor of 10.
http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k10/205/DruggedDriving.htm

Comment_arrow

Kevin Sterling

8:31 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Perhaps the California thing that I should be looking at it is that despite the fact that the population increasing by just under 20% between 1996 and 2011 that the rate of of Californians in addictions "treatment" FELL 11.12%? That the rate of Californians in "treatment" for opioids addiction fell 49.14%? That the rate of Californians in "treatment" for cocaine addiction fell 49.65%? That all of those numbers are significantly better than the nation as a whole?
http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/webt/quicklink/ca96.htm
http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/webt/quicklink/ca11.htm

Comment_arrow

Kevin Sterling

8:37 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Oh silly me, I guess I just don't have my priorities in order. I completely forgot the fact that the prohibitionist parasites in California have gotten their panties in a bunch because of the implementation of the Compassinate Use Act and that the poor police are "confused" by any policy other than absolute prohibition.

Reality is that by any objective measure the hysterical rhetoric of the prohibitionists has been proven wrong, wrong, wrong. But that doesn't stop them from continuing to promote their bald faced lies and half truths as if they were actually proven fact. After all, “Never let the facts get in the way of disseminating an effective piece of hysterical rhetoric” is the motto of the Know Nothing prohibitionist

Emmet Sweeney

2:43 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

other than, chemical drugs, the Drs know NOTHING about pain relief, Marajuana works for some people close to me.

Reply

Christine G

3:10 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

And the stoners come out. Didn't take you too long to spill your rhetoric on us now did it. Imagine you put this energy into helping your fellow human being do something other than get high. Explain California and the violence and trends in that state for us please, all marijuana related.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Sterling

8:39 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

See the actual facts about California detailed with the US government's own statistics cited as evidence. Where's your evidence that the government numbers are wrong?

Comment_arrow

ken b

6:17 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I can explain......California was the first of its kind # 1. #2 Cartels went rampant over there and tried to grab hold of the California economy with it....#3 Blame the fact that your on the border of Mexico and it was the state that had a 99 mature plant max (unless doc orders otherwise) or 100 square foot gardens per patient granted.....in RI the most you can have is 12 total.....Bottom line the bill wasn't written correctly and it was very susceptible to being tampered with and abused...as it was....If you compare the number of dispensarys from there over 900 just in la alone......to here we are aloud 3 (state licensed BIG DIFFERENCE) in ct...4 STATE LICENSED IN RI...Huge difference in policy...I support it.

Christine G

3:23 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Jillian is a professional advocate for marijuana and has comments on any marijuana story that come out not only on Patch but on many other pages as well. Take her for what her group is.I think Emmet just gets baked.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Sterling

8:43 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

If you can't argue the facts, resort to ad hominem attacks.

BTW, I'm pretty certain that Jillian is not a paid advocate. There are a lot of us who are simply fed up with the absolutely baseless nonsense spewed by the Ignorati on this issue. There are people who argue for what they believe is right based on factual evidence you know.

RicoF

5:51 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

I am 100% for legalizing marijuana the only thing I see may be an issue and I've seen it in other states is letting people grow up to six plants with a card. That just opens a window for the drug dealers to try to disguise their operation. Have the dependencies carry the product only, you don't get a card to make Oxycontin. For those against legalizing marijuana understand your train of thougt is because yo grew up being told it was bad and no good, but before you judge a book by it's cover know your facts first and really if you don't like it then don't use it. It's understandable that you want to keep it out children's hands (i would) but no matter what you think you do, they will always find a way and there is worse things than marijuana that are legal that children get into. My opinion if i had to choose a teenager getting into marijuana or alcohol, prescription drugs, other illegal drugs, even cigarettes, I would choose marijuana.

Reply

Lenny

8:23 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Nice spin Kevin you and your advocate groups should do a little homework on the small towns in the mountain areas that have been destroyed or certain areas of San Francisco that look like Blade Runner. You have your hazy opinions and I have mine. How about fixing our problems without adding to them. I know we can pay off the worlds debt and give them the munchies with the tax dollars it will generate. Save that for you and your pals at the hempfest.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Sterling

8:48 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

I gave you evidence and citations, you've regurgitated hysterical rhetoric. I'd be happy to review your evidence and citations. Insistence is not evidence and public policy formed on baseless irrational fear is not any way to "fix" our problems.

Comment_arrow

Matthew Hall

10:04 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Destroyed how? Like desolation? I seem to have missed this in the news.

Do you mean the areas around the dispensaries where violent crime has dropped? Seriously, what is it on the front lines in these 'disaster zones' that has you all worked up? I'm sick of the 'look at California' argument. What about California? The legal medi-pot is visible? So are colleges disaster zones too? Those places where people learn, and drink openly on the weekends?

All I can think of that you're referring to is National Park destruction--like those places that are being destroyed by illegal grows because people can't grow legally on their own property?

Lenny

8:26 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Kevin is part of a group too. Every marijuana story on the internet gets commented on from his group without any local knowledge or concern for our community or anyone elses either.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Sterling

8:50 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Q) How many prohibitionists does it take to change a light bulb?

A) None. Changing the bulb would be surrender. With enough effort we can make the old one work the way it’s supposed to.

Comment_arrow

Matthew Hall

10:24 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

What group? Did you know that by now, thousands of advocacy groups exist on Facebook trying to push this cause? Or are you just talking about the single group of over 50% of Americans that would like mj to be regulated like alcohol & the over 70% who would like to see it legalized medicinally (Gallup, Rasmussen)?

This is no longer a fringe issue; and it's not about getting stoned. It's about the 850,000 nonviolent arrestees whose lives are needlessly ruined annually by this harmful law; the over 50,000 Mexican homicide victims killed by the cartels our Government empowers with Black Market profits; the millions of patients whose health & well-beings are threatened by narcotic opiates; the scientific & social injustice of labeling a PLANT as a Schedule I substance (Zero medicinal value w/ high potential for abuse) while there have been ZERO toxicity deaths in over 6,000 years of medicinal & recreational use; and the economic factor everyone ignores--a revolutionary hemp industry allowing the domestic production of over 25,000 superior & renewable fibrous, fuel, composite, & construction materials.

Belittling this cause isn't only an insult to millions of patients & unnecessary criminals--but to your own intelligence.

www.Facebook.com/TokingPoints

Steven

11:11 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Kevin and Jillian as much as i agree with some of the things you are saying, and stand closer to your point than the others who commented, I must offer this advice, don't fall for irrelevant arguments, and argue them with more irrelevant points, it makes it seem emotionally charged and biased. Christines three statements are irrelevant to the article, and seemingly only made to start a strawman argument. She sounds like she is only here to spin off topic and portray those who support it as emotional charged rhetoric spouting hippies, which quit frankly she almost nails. good job Christine. but if you are to clarify her meaning, you see how irrelevant it is to Medical Cannabis in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. One must not validate association of strawman argumentation, by arguing against it. I would suggest asking more questions to further clarify the persons meaning so that one can argue against relevant issues in relation to the article, and or when having an empirical argument simply let the ignorant hang themselves.

question one: Christine do you believe Cannabis has no medical use?

question two: Christine what about California should I be looking at?

question Three: Christine where on the ballot does it mention anything about getting high?

Reply

Steven

11:56 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

question four: Lenny without using ad hominem authoritative, circumstantial, and abusive argument, what is it about medical cannabis you have problems with?

question five: Lenny what are your problems? are your problems the only problems in existence? and how do they relate to someone who's problem is that they are sick and need medicine because without they cant function to support there family, or just live without shaking?

At this point the evidence supporting cannabis use as medicine is empirical. The only people arguing this point at this day in age are those with mental health, and behavior problems, that allow ignorance as axiom of mind. In using transactional analysis one can see the parent ego's self centered and often selfish behavior rampant amongst those ignorant type mindsets. It takes to some degree a disassociation or lack of empathy so to say for someone to deny both empirical scientific evidence and humanity. I feel for these types and wish them well regardless.

Reply

Steven

12:20 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Please don't forget perception has probability and some lead this, because there is an old saying "first impression is best impression".

Reply

west meff

1:19 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

It's 2012 people need to WAKE UP.... the crimilization of any drug not just marijuana is so stone age, it's pea brain status quo old school conservative thinking that plagues our country.

1, it's immoral and NOT the governments job to tell anyone what they can or can't put into their bodies period. Your rights go as far as the next persons rights thats all you have to know. If we live in a society where we must protect people from themselves we should just forget about any form of government, it's a laughable idea.

2. The LAWS create the violence. Look at Mexico, look at our own streets, the majority of all violence is drug related, leagialize all drugs and you get rid of the perpetual cycle of violence. How many bootleg alcohol dealers do you see on the streets? Laws control addicts lives they have no choice but crime.

3. Any consistant person who wants drugs criminalized must want alcohol criminalized as well, as thats the most dangerous drug bar none. Majority of all overdoses heroin, perk, coke, ect come in combination with alcohol.

4. MONEY... it's costs around 50k to keep a healthy person in prison for one year.... medical condition and it's 100s of thousands. Is that how you want your money spend for the millions locked up on drug charges? When we could use an iota of that for rehab but the government needs to prison system to control the lower classes of society born with no opertunities.

You can never underestimate the stupidity of idiots in masses.

Reply

Gina

2:39 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Should Massachusetts allow marijuana to be used and grown for medicinal purposes? This is the actual question at hand and what is up for discussion. Please if you are not commenting on the actual issue of medical cannabis refrain from using this forum for your personal agenda and or outlet on your beliefs about Marijuana in general. It is hindering and slowing the legalization of the medicine for Patients who are in NEED. I am a resident of Mass and diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis and YES Cannabis should be legalized for Medicinal purposes. There is enough legitimate research that proves that Cannabis is a viable source to reduce spasticity in MS, reduce Pain, and slow progression of the disease. While people are deciding if they are OK with Cannabis people like me wait in Pain without hope and are subject to medicines that are legal that are more harmful than the disease itself??? It makes my family cry and me.

Reply

Krista Brack

10:03 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I have Ehlers Danlos Syndrome; it is a genetic connective tissue condition I was born with. I have lived my entire life in pain. I am 34 years old and by the time I was 32 I had spent 10 years on prescription narcotic pain medication. It made me miserable, sick, depressed. I couldn't think, move or function. I am extremely lucky to live in a legal state. Two years ago my doctor recommended medical marijuana, 6 months ago I came off ALL narcotic medication. I do not get 'high', after ten years of not being able to have a clear thought I am returning to school and have hope for my future. Narcotics nearly killed me; I was on such high doses I accidentally overdosed multiple times on those legal medications. I am so happy not to have to worry about accidentally killing myself on my new medication. Marijuana has never killed anyone. Marijuana saved my life and gave me a life worth living; I even have some days where I am not in pain at all.

Please, people of Massachusetts, if you are healthy consider that not everyone is and some of us have catastrophic health problems you could not imagine, we wouldn't want you to. I would not wish my pain on my worst enemy. Have compassion for us who struggle everyday just to get out of bed. This is a medicine, I went from being completely non functioning to being able to dress myself, make my own food, leave my house. These actions you take for granted I was unable to do before I started medical marijuana.

Reply

Kenny Brown

2:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Let the sick go unpunished.... Vote yes

Reply

Ryan Monahan

2:43 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Has prohibition ever worked? Let the suffering have their meds!! Why would anyone care what another adult puts in his/her own body? Seems to be a very easy decision for me.

Reply

Drew

9:10 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012

Im a 26 year old quadroplegic that suffers from chronic pain, full body spasms from legs, wrist and neck. I've Bernard on every pain killer known to help even propavoll also know as mothers milk or Michael Jackson killer and have had problems with my liver and kidney already at a young age and alot of stress on my relationship due to being in a zone and quick tempered from narcotics i ask those who want to object the medical cannabis vote please come sit and watch me live my day without it and tell us as patients its not right...narcotics make me drule and a zombie while cannabis keeps me sane and numb from spasms for hours.
VOTE YES!

Reply

Hannibal

9:46 am on Monday, July 2, 2012

Drew you can already get marijuana legally. You are not an issue I think the doctor farms that pop up to "prescribe" every little ache or complaint is going to be the problem. It has happened in every other state that has done this. Stoners and wasteoids please continue the nonsense now.Tell us how good it is for everyone

Reply

Leave a comment